HomeIndustry SectorsFinance and PolicyEskom Board firmly behind Eskom executive management team

Eskom Board firmly behind Eskom executive management team

The Eskom Board welcomes release of the Public Protector’s report, and the recommendation that a commission of inquiry be established to investigate all the issues using the Public Protector’s report as a starting point.

Eskom Chairman Baldwin Ngubane said board members and executives cited in the Public Protector’s report were not given an opportunity to clear their names before the report was published, but would avail themselves should the commission of inquiry require that.

“Regarding the continued innuendo that Eskom has been giving special favours to Tegeta Exploration and Resources, the Eskom Board stands firm by the processes undertaken by the company to conclude extensions of its coal supply agreements with its suppliers.

“We are satisfied that due process had been followed and we can be proud of the savings achieved by the executive team to date. In the six months to 30 September 2016, Eskom’s primary energy costs were reduced by 1.5% compared to an average increase of 18% over the past 5 years,” said Ngubane.

Eskom coal supply

Eskom regularly engages all its coal suppliers on the required volumes and qualities as the demand varies from time to time and contracting relationships are concluded on sound commercial principles and considerations.

In emergency situations, Eskom has utilised the prepayment mechanism to ensure security of supply. Furthermore, it is important to note that prepayment is a common commercial practice that is used widely and not unique to Eskom.

The principle of prepayment is prevalent in Eskom’s cost-plus supply contracts with the large mining houses such as Anglo American, BECSA and Exxaro. These mining houses supply approximately 80% of Eskom’s coal while Tegeta supplies less than 5% of the coal volume required by Eskom.

The coal supply market is in need of major transformation as it has and continues to benefit a small monopoly of companies. This phenomenon is now under review as requested by the Minister of Public Enterprises in her recent budget speech and Eskom is determined to ensure that emerging black miners also benefit from Eskom’s buying power.

More pertinently, Eskom’s supply mix changed in April 2016 leaving Eskom with a deficit of 2.1 million tonnes, which was required to meet the winter supply plan. Eskom approached its existing suppliers to source additional supply to mitigate this shortfall.

It must be noted that the Exxaro Arnot Colliery had a contract with Eskom to supply coal to Arnot Power Station for 40 years. This contract expired in December 2015. The cost of coal at date of expiry was ZAR1,132/tonne ($73.6).

“I am advised that Tegeta now supplies Arnot at an average price of ZAR500/ton. The unit cost of coal supplied under this contract is at a discounted rate of 3%, resulting in a further saving to Eskom of billions of rand and ultimately, the consumer,” said Ngubane.

Tegeta was one of the suppliers able to meet Eskom’s need for this additional coal supply at the required coal quality.

This company also stepped in to avert a crisis at the Hendrina Power Station by offering to take the Optimum Coal Mine out of business rescue from Glencore thereby saving thousands of jobs and continuing the supply to Eskom.

Eskom rejects any insinuation of favouritism towards suppliers such as Tegeta who are willing to step in to avert the coal supply crisis and allow Eskom to keep the lights on.

Eskom Board’s position summarised

  • It is concerned at Eskom not being interviewed by the Public Protector before releasing her report as per the agreed process established in September 2016.
  • It must be noted that Eskom was paying R1,132/tonne ($73.6) to Exxaro and this was on a cost plus basis.
  • Tegeta supplies Arnot at an average price of R500/tonne ($36.8), leading to savings of over a billion rand, leading to direct savings to Eskom customers.
  • Tegeta is a 51% black owned emerging miner which meets Eskom’s requirements.
  • Eskom has no issue doing business with the company based on sound commercial considerations.
  • Tegeta stepped in to avert a crisis at Hendrina Power Station by saving jobs and continues to supply Eskom at the original contracted price.
  • All due process has been followed and Eskom is proud of the savings achieved by its executives.
  • Prepayment is a common practice in coal purchasing and Eskom has used this mechanism previously. In fact, the cost-plus mines have been the recipients of an average amount of R38 billion ($2.8 billion) to date this year to companies such as Anglo, BHP Billiton and Exxarro.
  • Eskom firmly rejects the suggestion that Tegeta is favoured or that due process was not followed.
Ashley Theron
Ashley Theron-Ord is based in Cape Town, South Africa at Clarion Events-Africa. She is the Senior Content Producer across media brands including ESI Africa, Smart Energy International, Power Engineering International and Mining Review Africa.