HomeIndustry SectorsBusiness and marketsEd’s Note | The aggressive play for South Africa’s energy market

Ed’s Note | The aggressive play for South Africa’s energy market

The energy landscape in South Africa currently resembles a football match where opposing teams focus on taking possession of the ball (generation build) and scoring points by sending it hurtling past the goalkeeper (the national energy regulator). 

Originally published in the ESI Africa weekly newsletter on 2019/03/27 – subscribe today

The teams—renewables versus thermal—have a long history with one appearing to be winning the match at one time or another. The referee, in the form of swaying political will, has issued red cards to both sides leaving spectators (consumers) impatient.

Solar and wind scored a goal when the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement (REIPPP) programme was signed into existence.

However, this was short lived when former energy minister Joemat-Pettersson issued a request for proposals laying the groundwork for the country’s new nuclear energy build programme.

In mid-2016 Eskom halted the match and called foul, stating that it was not willing to sign further power purchase agreements for renewables projects.

According to the utility, it had surplus generation capacity and that in the long run, renewables would prove too costly as Eskom was forced to sell at a loss.

The thermal industry has pushed the boundaries, with the support of trade unions, to keep its star player, coal-fired power, in the game. However, yesterday’s High Court judgement finds no irregularities by Nersa in the issue of electricity generation licenses to successful IPP bidders.

Regardless of who wins the match trophy, Eskom has been in crisis mode since 2008, attested by the extreme rotational loadshedding currently underway.

The road travelled to this point has left the utility plagued by operational, financial, and managerial under-performance, compounded by political interference.

There is an urgent need for the unbundling, or a form of privatisation, of Eskom as well as finalising the integrated resource plan. However, with the political environment on tenterhooks, I predict a delay until after the elections on 8 May.

There is also speculation that the Department of Energy could be combined with the Department of Mineral Resources with Gwede Mantashe at the helm of the new entity.

Do you feel there is any truth to this rumour?

To read the previous note from the editor, click here.

Nicolette Pombo-van Zyl
Nicolette is the Editor of ESI Africa print journal, ESI-Africa.com and the annual African Power & Energy Elites. She is passionate about placing African countries on the international stage and is driven by the motto "The only way to predict the future is to create it". Join her in creating a sustainable future through articles and multimedia content.